British
BBC News centers Trump's ultimatum and the diplomatic progress announced by Rubio and Bessent, foregrounding institutional decision-maker statements and the credibility of deal timelines.
Indian
The Hindu foregrounds US Treasury Secretary Bessent's timeline claim and Iranian-Omani diplomatic engagement, framing events through strategic autonomy and regional collective positioning without Western alignment.
Emirati
The National highlights Iran's assertion that Trump threats are delaying a deal and details the emerging 'middle corridor' shipping route concept, emphasizing Gulf regional autonomy and collective security framing.
Turkish
Daily Sabah frames Hormuz negotiations through institutional accountability for energy security, positioning the standoff as institutional violence through accountability mechanism failure.
Italian
La Repubblica covers US-Iran-Oman negotiation details including a draft granting transit commissions, and quotes a Middle East expert calling any deal a 'bitter pill' for Trump leaving the straits to the ayatollahs.
Israeli
Times of Israel reports Treasury Secretary's deal-by-Wednesday claim and notes Trump called off an Iran attack after being assured a deal was imminent, centering Israeli security interests and the Iran threat.
Pakistani
Dawn frames the Hormuz negotiations through Pakistan's concern that the US has no exit strategy, calling the war 'disastrous' and questioning Washington's endgame, while also reporting Qatar's mediation progress.
Singaporean
CNA and Straits Times analyze shipping route vulnerability and supply-chain implications of the Hormuz standoff, reporting Trump's warning and deal progress through a pragmatic logistics and infrastructure lens.
Qatari
Al Jazeera Arabic covers Hormuz negotiations but positions the story within an entertainment-saturated editorial hierarchy, framing US anticipation versus Iranian denial in a comparatively subordinated geopolitical context.
Mexican
El Universal and El Tiempo frame Trump's Hormuz ultimatum through US executive institutional accountability, treating the conflict as a matter of presidential decision-making responsibility rather than geopolitical analysis.
Colombian
El Tiempo positions the Iran war and Hormuz standoff as a reflection of US executive decision-making accountability, questioning Washington's strategy and flagging the Pentagon's unusual search for 'creative and unconventional' military ideas.